By Jonathon Van Maren
CANADA, November 2, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – If you needed any evidence that Canada’s abortion activists are incapable of having a mature, informed discussion and prefer to simply shut down any inconvenient facts by any means possible, look no further than the almost farcical response to a campaign by Canadian lobby group We Need A Law (WNAL).
Early this summer, thirty billboards went up from Victoria to Halifax, reading simply “Canada Has No Abortion Laws,” followed by We Need A Law’s website and a phone number (I spotted two of them during my travels: one in downtown Brantford, the other near Kamloops). This is a rather anodyne and factual statement, and has been true since the Supreme Court’s R v. Morgentaler decision of 1988. It is difficult to see how such a statement could actually cause controversy.
But this is Canada, and the abortion activists here are distinguished for the ability to become unhinged at the slightest provocation. “I think it’s trying to foster fear and stigma and I think that kind of message can be really dangerous,” Sarah Baddely, the Halifax Chair of the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund, sniveled to Global News. Other abortion supporters also chimed in to claim that this bland legal fact could constitute “harmful messaging.”
These reactions are staggering in their dishonesty and hypocrisy. “Joyce Arthur, spokesperson for the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada, has taken many opportunities to state that Canada has no abortion laws,” Mike Schouten of We Need A Law told me by email. “And yet, she described our ad with words like ‘demeaning, discriminatory, and degrading.’ What is demeaning is to think that women, or anyone, want anything less than the truth.”
Nonetheless, the abortion activists actually succeeded in getting facts that they regularly trumpet themselves suppressed. “The ads were unapproved by an organization called Ad Standards,” noted WNAL’s legal counsel Tabitha Ewert. “Ad Standards has no legal authority, but most of the major advertisers voluntarily submit to their decisions. Ad Standards has a process where anyone can complain about the ad they see, a council will review the claim and decide if the ad is misleading, offensive, discriminatory etc.”
“Pro-abortion activists have figured out this system and will encourage their supporters to complain about pro-life ads,” Ewert added. “The Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada even has a guide on their website that tells people how to most effectively complain about pro-life ads. Ad Standards knows this is happening and has done nothing to prevent it but instead routinely rules against pro-life ads based on complaints initiated by pro-abortion activists. There were a couple pro-abortion activists who instituted complaints against our ad that the council reviewed and upheld this fall.”
This is where it gets even more Orwellian. “In our latest communication with Ad Standards, we requested a clear explanation of what they think the law is in Canada,” Ewert told me by email. “In response we were told that our ads are ‘literally true,’ but that ‘that fact obscures reality.’ They go on to suggest that the law is that Morgentaler decriminalized abortion. That means their understanding of the law is that abortion is decriminalized. In other words, the law is there is no law.”
And how do they justify this? Simple, apparently. According to Ewert, “They have decided they don’t need to concern themselves with ‘precise legality or literal truth of a presentation’ but only with the ‘general impression’ of the advertisement.” In other words, Ad Standards worked with abortion activists to suppress facts that they admitted with “literally true,” but might give a bad impression of abortion in Canada. They deliberately worked to keep facts that could hurt their agenda away from Canadians.