I’ve been writing about the use of eugenic abortions to target children with Down syndrome in the womb for some time. It is one of the tragedies of our age that children considered to be “imperfect” by doctors and parents are killed despite the overwhelming likelihood that they will be happy; a society with no room for such people is a poor one, indeed. Now, people with Down syndrome are standing up for themselves. From the BBC:
A woman with Down’s syndrome who is challenging abortion law’s stance on babies with the condition says the legislation “doesn’t respect my life”.
Heidi Carter, 26, from Coventry, is one of three claimants whose case against the UK government at the High Court began on Tuesday.
As law stands, foetuses with Down’s syndrome may be terminated up to birth.
Jason Coppal QC, the claimants’ barrister, told the High Court the current law “stereotypes and demeans”.
He told Lord Justice Singh and Mrs Justice Lieven that claimant Máire Lea-Wilson “believes it is morally and ethically wrong to destroy a life on the grounds of a disability.
“But what we will try and establish is that it is legally wrong”.
Lawyers argued at the two-day hearing that the law is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and therefore unlawfully discriminatory.
“Two of the claimants are in the minority of foetuses who were diagnosed with the condition and not aborted and they live happy and fulfilling lives, as evidence shows the majority of people with Down’s syndrome do,” Mr Coppal told the court.
In England, Scotland and Wales, there is a general 24-week time limit to have an abortion.
But law states terminations can be performed well beyond that window if there is “a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”, which includes Down’s syndrome.
Mrs Carter, who campaigns under her maiden name of Crowter, said: “I am someone who has Down’s syndrome and I find it extremely offensive that a law doesn’t respect my life, and I won’t stand for it.
“I want to change the law and I want to challenge people’s perception of Down’s syndrome. I want them to look at me and say ‘this is just a normal person’.”
media captionDown’s syndrome: Abortion case heads to High Court
Ms Lea-Wilson, of west London, said she was bringing the legal challenge because she wanted her son Aidan “to grow up knowing he’s not someone people have to cope with, he’s not a burden to society, he is a wonderful human being in his own right”.
“I have two sons who I love and I value equally and I can’t understand why the law doesn’t.”
She said: “I was 34 weeks pregnant when I discovered Aidan had Down’s syndrome and I was asked if I wanted to terminate the pregnancy in the context of a lot of medically-biased information, and my own grief, three times.
“The last time I was asked to terminate the pregnancy was two days before he was born.”
The challengers, supported by campaign group Don’t Screen Us Out, held a demonstration outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London earlier.
Mrs Carter said the legal bid was not about challenging women’s right to choose, which she respected.
But she said of expectant mothers whose unborn babies had been diagnosed with Down’s syndrome: “I just want them to get the right information, and just meet someone who has [the condition].”
Clare Murphy, from the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, told BBC Breakfast: “We’re talking about a relatively small number of abortions every year that take place after 24 weeks.
“These are incredibly challenging, heartbreaking circumstances involving often very, very much wanted pregnancies, where women have to make really tough decisions.”
I hope that this campaign is successful. Consider, here, that this is about abortion, but it is also about more than abortion. Doctors constantly pressure parents into abortions for explicitly eugenic reasons, and frequently succeed in scaring them into opting for feticide. Abortion is a deadly tool used to kill children who are unwanted for reasons that appalled the world in the 1930s and 1940s, and are now back in vogue.
Perhaps coming face to face with the people who are being killed—and hearing their demands—will shame our society into action.
