With just two months in office, J.D. Vance has become one of the most influential vice presidents in recent American history. He is Trump’s explainer and attack dog rolled into one, sitting down for press interviews to detail the president’s policies and responding on X to journalists, historians, and politicians to defend the administration’s actions. Trump has notably declined to endorse Vance as his heir-apparent (yet), but the vice president is clearly second only to the man himself as the voice of the White House.
Consider what the vice president has been saying about the sanctity of unborn life. At the Conservative Political Action Conference last month, Vance cited several of the Trump administration’s pro-life policies and praised Trump’s selection of the Supreme Court justices that brought down Roe v. Wade. Then, he went further. “We’ve got to persuade our fellow citizens that unborn life is worthy of protecting, it is sacred in the eyes of God,” Vance said, “and it should be sacred in the eyes of man, too, and we have to pick up the torch and fight for that every single day.”
This unequivocal statement is encouraging because during the presidential campaign, Vance shifted away from his previously sterling pro-life credentials to echo Trump’s pro-choice stance. He affirmed his support of Trump’s position on the abortion pill, and told the press that Trump would veto any federal abortion legislation. Vance also came off as apologetic about pro-life views during the vice-presidential debate with Tim Walz and his interview with Joe Rogan.
Prior to being the vice-presidential nominee, Vance had consistently defended the comprehensive approach of the pro-life movement. As he told me in an interview during his Ohio senatorial campaign: “I think any truly pro-life movement is going to focus not just on the cultural pressure to have an abortion, the legal right to have an abortion, but also on the economic pressures that will make that more likely to happen in the first place. To the American pro-life movement’s credit, I think we have tended to fight on all those fronts.”
Vance was precisely right, as the network of more than 3,000 crisis pregnancy centers across America proves. But during the presidential campaign, he began to emphasize that the pro-life movement must “do better.” This is true as far as it goes—a movement committed to saving unborn lives should always seek to improve—but Vance’s comments were clearly a tactic rather than a critique. To be fair, he was in a tough position, trying to echo the presidential candidate’s evolving position on abortion while remaining true to his own principles. But at times, he wasn’t quite pulling it off.
One thought on “J.D. Vance is becoming a champion for the unborn”
Navi says:
Pardoning the pro-life people that were convicted for protesting is great, but other than that we haven’t gotten much more than virtue-signalling out of this administration. Although still a thousand times better than a Harris-Walz administration would’ve been (they would’ve nuked the filibuster to legalize tax-funded abortion in all 50 states), I would’ve at least expected an administration with a pro-life vice president to do more on the abortion pill. At very least restoring the Bush-Obama-Trump era regulations that prevented Pills by Post (consistent with existing federal law) and taking action against criminals like Margaret Carpenter, perhaps during a fast news cycle early on (if they’re worried about electoral risk). Speaking of which, whatever happened on that story? Did Louisiana or any other state actually do anything about her?
Pardoning the pro-life people that were convicted for protesting is great, but other than that we haven’t gotten much more than virtue-signalling out of this administration. Although still a thousand times better than a Harris-Walz administration would’ve been (they would’ve nuked the filibuster to legalize tax-funded abortion in all 50 states), I would’ve at least expected an administration with a pro-life vice president to do more on the abortion pill. At very least restoring the Bush-Obama-Trump era regulations that prevented Pills by Post (consistent with existing federal law) and taking action against criminals like Margaret Carpenter, perhaps during a fast news cycle early on (if they’re worried about electoral risk). Speaking of which, whatever happened on that story? Did Louisiana or any other state actually do anything about her?