Gay columnist condemns “exposing children” to “debauchery” at Pride Parades

By Jonathon Van Maren

A few years back, my friend JJ McCullough published a rather unpopular column, noting that although Pride parades have become a litmus test for one’s level of tolerance these days, there are plenty of people—himself included—who simply find them distasteful displays of indecency. The media and progressive politicians like to gang up on conservative politicians and demand that they show up and frolic with the crowds or be damned as unforgivable bigots, despite the fact that these events now regularly expose children to male adult nudity and simulated sex acts, something that progressives seem to collectively ignore.

Just in time for Pride Month, Josh deHaas has published a column in the National Post titled “I’m gay, and I wouldn’t blame Doug Ford for avoiding Toronto’s Pride Parade,” essentially concurring with McCullough’s thesis:

One of the first decisions premier-designate Doug Ford will need to make is whether to march in Toronto’s gay Pride parade later this month. If he doesn’t submit to strolling down Yonge Street while getting soaked by leather-clad men armed with water guns, his critics will claim it’s proof he hates gays.

But there are some perfectly legitimate reasons to skip the annual bash. I’m gay, and I boycotted the parade last year. So did a lot of other people, apparently: Pride’s beverage sales declined from $348,917 in 2016 to $197,336 in 2017…

DeHaas then points out that Pride events have become heavily politicized, with the police being told to stay away due to pressure from groups like Black Lives Matter, as well as association with other left-wing fringe groups. And then he makes several points that are sure to incur the wrath of the LGBT crowd—if a politician were to make them, they would find themselves pilloried overnight:

And that’s not the only reason a centrist or right-leaning politician might want to skip.

Some on the left have claimed Ford’s description of Pride as an event where “middle-aged men with pot bellies” run down the street “buck naked” was evidence of homophobia. I’d say that was just an accurate description of what goes on. Disturbingly, more and more parents are bringing young children to watch the parade, exposing them to provocative displays of sexuality that no child should witness. If a politician believes in family values, why would he or she want to be associated with such debauchery?

In fact, the main focus of Canada’s gay lobby recent years has been demanding that taxpayers fund PrEP, an expensive HIV medication that gay men can take to reduce their risk of catching the virus during condomless sex. Experts are now, unsurprisingly, linking PrEP to a rise in drug-resistant gonorrhea. For many gay men, PrEP is nothing more than an aid to promiscuity, yet left-wing governments in Ontario, B.C. and Quebec have all started using precious health-care dollars to hand it out for free.

While conservative politicians face constant pressure to show up at Pride events, none of them dare to respond to those accusing them of various phobias with a few simple questions: Do you think public nudity is appropriate? Is it “homophobic” to think that sex acts, simulated or otherwise, should remain indoors? Should children be exposed to male adult nudity? Should politicians condemn the presence of children at events where adult nudity is common and expected?

I, for one, would be very interested to hear how these questions would be answered.

_____________________________________

For anyone interested, my book on The Culture War, which analyzes the journey our culture has taken from the way it was to the way it is and examines the Sexual Revolution, hook-up culture, the rise of the porn plague, abortion, commodity culture, euthanasia, and the gay rights movement, is available for sale here.

FacebooktwitterFacebooktwitter

3 thoughts on “Gay columnist condemns “exposing children” to “debauchery” at Pride Parades

  1. Gail Norton says:

    Thank you for your article on the gay pride parade. I totally agree that it is aweful for young children to attend a distasteful parade of nude people and simulated sex acts which must puzzle them as to what are those people all about!

    It is a sad commentary on our country of Canada where the young are so easily demoralized by the exibitionists who could care less who sees them. My heart breaks for our families who are called terrible names because they have an opinion different from those who support this outrageous display. May God help us to change to something better! Mr. Ford please stand up for decency.

  2. Karen says:

    If anyone else were to walk down the street in this manner we would be arrested for indecent exposure. How is there “pride” in that? And why would anyone bring a kid to that? I don’t care if you are gay or not, I don’t need to see you publicly act out what you do in the bedroom. When did this become ok? Such a messed up world.

    • Carol says:

      I totally agree. Why is our prime minister flaunting the parade as though it is a great honor to be gay then condems those who do not wish to participate. Is he not embarrassed having his children walk amongst nudity & gross sexual behaviour. Is it possible he may be need to take a good look at himself & his actions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *